Feb 05 2010

Urgent Action – Henry Skinner, Execution Date February 24th

Published by Joachim Kübler under Urgent Action

URGENT ACTION

To read the current Urgent Action newsletter, go to http://www.amnestyusa.org/urgent/newslett.html
———————————-
For a print-friendly version of this Urgent Action (PDF):
http://www.amnestyusa.org/actioncenter/actions/uaa03110.pdf

4 February 2010

UA 31/10                Death penalty

USA                     Henry Skinner (m)

Henry Skinner, a 47-year-old man, is due to be executed in Texas on 24 February. He was convicted of the 1993 murder of his girlfriend and her two sons in the house all four shared. He maintains his innocence and is seeking clemency and DNA testing of evidence from the crime.

At around midnight on 31 December 1993, police in Pampa, Texas, found Elwin Caler, 22, sitting on the porch of his neighbor’s house with a fatal stab wound. He died without identifying his assailant. Next door, the police found the body of Elwin Caler’s mother, Twila Busby, who had had been strangled and bludgeoned to death. Her other son, Randy Busby, 20, had been stabbed in his bed. About three hours later, police arrested Twila Busby’s boyfriend, Henry Skinner, in the home of his former girlfriend, Andrea Reed, a short distance away. He had a deep cut on his hand, and had blood on his clothes, including blood which was found to be from Twila Busby and Elwin Caler.

Henry Skinner pleaded not guilty at his 1995 trial, with his lawyers presenting the theory that he had been physically unable to commit the crimes and that the police had ignored a plausible alternative suspect. The defense presented a toxicologist who testified that, in his opinion, it was highly improbable that Henry Skinner could have committed the murders because of his level of intoxication with alcohol and codeine on the night in question. The state presented no expert evidence to rebut this testimony, suggesting instead that his history of drug and alcohol abuse made him tolerant to such substances. The defense also presented expert testimony that a hand injury Henry Skinner had sustained a few months earlier had left him without the strength required to have inflicted Twila Busby’s severe injuries. Nevertheless, the jury voted to convict Henry Skinner and sentence him to death.

The case against Henry Skinner remains circumstantial, showing only that he was present at the scene of the murders, a fact that he has never disputed. Since the trial, further evidence pointing to the possible alternative suspect has emerged, and Andrea Reed, whom the state used as a key prosecution witness, has recanted parts of her trial testimony (see overleaf). The nationally-renowned Medill Innocence Project at Northwestern University in Illinois – whose work has contributed to the release of 11 wrongfully convicted prisoners in the USA, including five on death row – has investigated the case and concluded that Henry Skinner’s “guilt is questionable at best, and in fact he may well be innocent”. The Project’s Director, Professor David Protess, has written to the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles that “in more than twenty years of investigating and researching possible wrongful convictions, I have rarely seen a case this circumstantial and shaky in which the prisoner was actually guilty”.

Henry Skinner continues to seek DNA testing of evidence from the crime which he maintains could point to another person as the murderer. The items include vaginal swabs and fingernail clippings taken from Twila Busby, biological material on a windbreaker jacket that was found next to her body and on two knives found at the scene.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
According to evidence at the 1995 trial, at about 10.30pm on 31 December 1993, Howard Mitchell went to the home of Twila Busby and Henry (“Hank”) Skinner to take them to a party. Howard Mitchell was unable to wake Henry Skinner, who had passed out intoxicated on a sofa. At the trial, Howard Mitchell described Henry Skinner as having been “completely unconscious” and “kind of comatose” (that is, within an hour and a half of the murders). Howard Mitchell and Twila Busby went to the party, but he dropped her home within an hour, after she complained of being sexually harassed at the party by her uncle, Robert Donnell.

At the trial, the defence argued that Robert Donnell (who was killed in a car crash in 1997) was a plausible alternative suspect who was never investigated by the police due to the focus on Henry Skinner. In 1997 Howard Mitchell made a sworn statement saying that about four months before her death, Twila Busby had told him that Robert Donnell had been making “sexual advances towards her and that he had even tried to rape her”. At a federal court hearing in 2005, a neighbor of Robert Donnell testified that a couple of days after the murders, she had seen him thoroughly clean the inside of his truck and then paint the outside of it. She said that this conduct was out of the ordinary, as she had never seen him clean the vehicle before. She said that Robert Donnell wore a windbreaker jacket all the time (apparently similar to that found at the crime scene), and she and other witnesses at the hearing testified that he always carried a knife, and had threatened people with it. At the trial, the prosecution introduced a statement Henry Skinner gave to investigators three days after his arrest in which he said he remembered little after falling asleep on the sofa. It also presented Andrea Reed, who testified that at about midnight on the night in question, Skinner had come to her trailer and told her a series of inconsistent stories about what had happened, including that he thought that he might have “kicked” Twila Busby to death (there was no evidence that she had been kicked). She said that Henry Skinner had threatened to kill her if she called the police. In 1997, she recanted parts of her trial testimony. She said that he had not threatened to kill her, and that he had been far more intoxicated than her trial testimony indicated. She said that she had lied because she was afraid of being arrested herself and of her young daughter being forced to testify. She said: “The lies that I told to protect myself made it appear as if Hank broke into my house, held me hostage and confessed to the murders. The truth is that I invited a harmless drunk into my house and listened to three hours of meaningless gibberish”.

The appeal courts have upheld the death sentence over a period of 15 years. In his letter to the Texas clemency board, Professor Protess recalls the case of Anthony Porter, another which the Medill Innocence Project investigated. Anthony Porter had been on death row for more than 16 years in Illinois, his conviction and sentence upheld by the courts. Fifty hours from execution in 1999, he received a stay. The Project then uncovered Anthony Porter’s wrongful conviction and he was subsequently released.

The US death penalty system has repeatedly been shown to be capable of error. Since 1976, more than 130 people have been released from death rows around the country on the grounds of innocence. Since 1989, DNA testing has contributed to the exoneration of more than more than 200 people convicted of criminal offenses in the USA, including 17 on death row. Some prisoners have gone to their execution despite serious doubts about their guilt. They include Cameron Willingham, executed in Texas in 2004 despite expert evidence that the fire which killed the victims was accidental rather than the result of arson.

Amnesty International unconditionally opposes the execution of Henry Skinner, regardless of his guilt or innocence, as it does all executions. The USA has carried out 1,194 executions since resuming judicial killing in 1977. Texas accounts for 449 of these executions (see Too much cruelty, too little clemency: Texas nears 200th execution under current governor, April 2009, http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/AMR51/057/2009/en). There have been six executions in the USA this year, two of them in Texas.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Please send appeals to arrive as quickly as possible:

- Explaining that you are not seeking to excuse the killing of Twila Busby and her two sons;
- Noting the serious doubts that remain about Henry Skinner’s guilt;
- Calling for clemency for Henry Skinner and for commutation of his death sentence;
- Calling on the state to grant Henry Skinner’s request for DNA testing of crime scene evidence.

APPEALS TO:

Note: include Inmate No: #999143

Rissie L. Owens, Presiding Officer,
Board of Pardons and Paroles, Executive Clemency Section
8610 Shoal Creek Boulevard,
Austin, TX 78757
Fax: 1 512 467 0945
Salutation: Dear Ms Owens

Governor Rick Perry
Office of the Governor
P.O. Box 12428
Austin, Texas 78711-2428
Fax: 1 512 463 1849
Salutation: Dear Governor

PLEASE SEND APPEALS IMMEDIATELY.
Check with the AIUSA Urgent Action office if sending appeals after 24 February 2010.

———————————-
Tip of the Month:
Write as soon as you can. Try to write as close as possible to the date a case is issued.

** POSTAGE RATES **
Within the United States:
$0.28 – Postcards
$0.44 – Letters and Cards (up to 1 oz.)
To Canada:
$0.75 – Postcards
$0.75 – Airmail Letters and Cards (up to 1 oz.)
To Mexico:
$0.79 – Postcards
$0.79 – Airmail Letters and Cards (up to 1 oz.)
To all other destination countries:
$0.98 – Postcards
$0.98 – Airmail Letters and Cards (up to 1 oz.)

Amnesty International is a worldwide grassroots movement that promotes and defends human rights.

This Urgent Action may be reposted if kept intact, including contact information and stop action date (if applicable). Thank you for your help with this appeal.

Urgent Action Network
Amnesty International USA
600 Pennsylvania Ave SE 5th fl
Washington DC 20003
Email: uan@aiusa.org
http://www.amnestyusa.org/urgent/
Phone: 202.544.0200
Fax: 202.675.8566

———————————-
END OF URGENT ACTION APPEAL
———————————-

No responses yet

Feb 04 2010

Und in Ohio…

Published by Joachim Kübler under Hinrichtung

Heute wurde in Ohio Mark Brown (37) hingerichtet. Brown wurde wegen der Ermordung des Ladeninhabers Isam Salman (im Jahre 1994) zum Tode verurteilt. Bei dem Raubüberfall auf Salman’s Laden wurde auch der Angestellte Hayder Al-Turk getötet, Brown wurde aber nur wegen der Ermordung von Salman zum Tode verurteilt.

Brown’s Hinrichtung war die dritte in Ohio per Lethal Injection von einer tödlichen Substanz, einer Überdosis des Anästhetikums Natriumpentothal. Mark Brown wurde heute um 10.49 Uhr Ortszeit für tot erklärt.

Brown’s Hinrichtung war die 1194. Hinrichtung in den USA seit der Wiederaufnahme von Hinrichtungen am 17.01.1977. Eine Liste der Hinrichtungen in den USA seit Entscheidung des U.S. Supreme Court in Baze et al. v. Rees finden Sie hier.

Via Steve Hall.

No responses yet

Feb 04 2010

Someone Always Hates Someone

Wer mich näher kennt weiß dass ich sehr pessimistisch (eigentlich schon nihilistisch) bin was die Fähigkeit der Menschheit sich zu zivilisieren angeht – oder was den Menschen an sich betrifft.

Wenn man das Ringen um die Todesstrafe von einer, äh, “höheren” Warte aus betrachtet findet man folgende Parteien (ohne Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit):

  • Die Person(en) die ermordet wurde(n)
  • Die Person(en) die deswegen zum Tode verurteilt wurden
  • Richter, der die die Person zum Tode verurteilte (ohne/mit “Empfehlung” der Jury)
  • Richter, die das Todesurteil auf höheren Berufungsebenen bestätigten (oder seltener: Es nicht bestätigten)
  • die Angehörigen/Freunde des/der Mordopfer(s), die ein Todesurteil sehen wollen
  • die Angehörigen/Freunde des/der Angeklagten, die kein Todesurteil sehen wollen
  • diejenigen, die gegen die Todesstrafe kämpfen (aus welchem Grund auch immer)
  • diejenigen, die für die Todesstrafe kämpfen (aus welchem Grund auch immer)

Ich denke sehr oft über diese Zusammenhänge nach und die zugrunde liegende Absurdität. Wobei “Absurdität” ein zu abstraktes Wort sein mag – “Tragik” trifft es vielleicht besser?

Man kann sich nun natürlich fragen warum all diese Menschen involviert sind und das führt uns zur Wurzel des Übels. Während ich über diese Wurzel nachdachte (die auf den ersten Blick unverborgen zu sein scheint, was sie aber de facto nicht ist) stieß ich auf ein Lied von Mike & the Mechanics mit dem Titel “Someone Always Hate someone”, erschienen auf dem Album “Beggar On A Beach Of Gold” (und ich gebe zu, ich hätte solch ein Lied von dieser Gruppe nie erwartet – was einen Schluss auf meine musikalischen Vorurteile zulassen mag):

Someone Always Hates Someone

Last night I shook hands with the devil
In a dream that I can never lose
He laughed when he saw me cryin’
At the pictures on the evening news
He said it’s not really a dilemma
You’re just a little out of touch
Don’t think of the situation
Cos it’ll make you think too much

Someone always hates someone
Someone always hates someone
Someone always sells a gun
Cos someone always hates someone

A child will be born tomorrow
As open as an empty cup
And we’ll fill it with hope and sorrow
The very things that messed us up
We’ll ask him to join the congregation
A hindu moslem christian or jew
Pretty soon he’ll recognise his brothers
But soon he’ll know the enemy too

Someone always hates someone
Someone always hates someone
Someone always buys a gun
Cos someone always hates someone

I died and I went to heaven
In a dream I never had before
A good friend who had gone before me
Had kindly left my name at the door
I looked on the face of the almighty
Couldn’t help myself
I started to shout
How come you made a mess of things
How come you didn’t work it out

He said
Someone always hates someone
Someone always hates someone
There’s so much love for everyone
But someone always hates someone

 

Offensichtlich wird in diesem Lied der Schwerpunkt auf religiös motivierten Hass gelegt, was meine Vorurteile bestätigen mag, denn es gibt ja auch den ideologisch motivierten Hass, oder auch den Hass der den je eigenen Traumata entspringt.

Wie dem auch sein mag, vielleicht macht all dies ein wenig deutlich dass es im Kampf gegen die Todesstrafe um mehr geht als um eine Form der Justiz (sofern diese Form diese Bezeichnung überhaupt verdient). Es geht vielmehr um den Menschen und seine Fähigkeit zum Guten und zum Bösen, um seine Fähigkeit zum Hass und um die Wurzel genau dieser Fähigkeiten und des damit verbundenen Verhaltens.

Würde die Todesstrafe tatsächlich weltweit abgeschafft (und im Geheimen nicht weiter praktiziert) würde das den Menschen nicht “besser” machen. Sie werden sich fragen:”Warum?” Nun, um diese Frage zu beantworten schauen Sie in den Spiegel und gleichzeitig in íhr Herz.

Text von “Someone Always Hates Someone” via Lyricsfreak.

No responses yet

Jan 31 2010

Urgent Action – Martin Grossman, Execution Date February 16th

Published by Joachim Kübler under Urgent Action

URGENT ACTION APPEAL – From Amnesty International USA

To read the current Urgent Action newsletter, go to http://www.amnestyusa.org/urgent/newslett.html
———————————-
For a print-friendly version of this Urgent Action (PDF):
http://www.amnestyusa.org/actioncenter/actions/uaa02710.pdf

29 January 2010

UA 27/10         Death Penalty
USA   Martin Grossman (m)

Martin Grossman, a 45-year-old white man, is due to be executed in the US state of Florida at 6pm on 16 February for a crime committed when he was 19 years old. He was convicted of murder in 1985, and has been on death row for nearly a quarter of a century.

Margaret Park, a 26-year-old woman employed as a wildlife officer by the state Game and Fish Commission, was shot dead while on patrol in coastal mid-western Florida on 13 December 1984. About two weeks later, 19-year-old Martin Grossman and Thayne Taylor, aged 17, were arrested. The two were tried jointly. Grossman was convicted of first-degree murder. Taylor was convicted of third-degree murder, a non-capital offense.

At the sentencing for Martin Grossman, the defense presented four witnesses – the defendant’s mother, a childhood friend, and two correctional staff – in an attempt to portray his positive attributes to counter the facts of the crime on which the state was relying to obtain a death sentence. However, the jury voted for death, the judge accepted its recommendation, rejected Grossman’s young age as a mitigating factor, and determined that there were no mitigating factors. The aggravating factors were held to include that the murder was committed to avoid arrest and that it was especially “wicked, evil, atrocious or cruel”.

The appeal courts have rejected the claim that Grossman received inadequate representation at the sentencing phase. In an affidavit, Grossman’s lead trial lawyer said that he and his defense colleague had done a “very poor and ineffective job”. Upholding the death sentence in 2005, however, a federal judge ruled that this view was “premised on the benefit of hindsight”. The second defense lawyer, who had been hired only two weeks before the sentencing to prepare mitigation evidence, stated that they should have told the trial judge that they were not ready.

The defense presented no expert mental health testimony, after their court-appointed psychologist told them that his assessment of Grossman had uncovered no problems serious enough to aid their defense. However, a forensic psychologist hired by Martin Grossman’s lawyers several years after his conviction drew a different conclusion after a more thorough assessment. He concluded that there was much mental health evidence that called into question the notion that Martin Grossman had acted in premeditated fashion at the time of the crime or that should serve as mitigating evidence. Martin Grossman had “compromised intellectual functioning, probable brain dysfunction”, and a “developmental history characterized by profound and untreated complicated bereavement” – (including as a result of the death in 1981 of his father, during whose long and serious illness Martin had acted as primary care-giver) — “a high level of fear and depression, and parental neglect, abandonment and mistreatment.”

BACKGROUND INFORMATION
According to the trial record, Martin Grossman and Thayne Taylor had driven to a wooded area on the night of 13 December 1984 to shoot a handgun that Grossman had recently obtained. The two teenagers were confronted by Margaret Park who found the gun and began to radio the police. Martin Grossman, who was on probation at the time following a burglary conviction, pleaded with her not to turn him in as it would mean going back to prison. When she refused, he grabbed her torch and repeatedly struck her with it, with Taylor coming to his assistance. Margaret Park managed to draw her gun, and fire off a shot before Martin Grossman grabbed the weapon and fired a single shot which struck the officer in the head.

About two weeks later, Grossman and Taylor were arrested after an acquaintance, Brian Allan, told the police that they had admitted to the crime. The two had also apparently told another friend, Brian Hancock, of the shooting, and Martin Grossman also allegedly related the details of the shooting to a jail mate, Charles Brewer. The two defendants were tried jointly, over the objection of Martin Grossman’s lawyer. The prosecution introduced the testimony of Allan, Hancock and Brewer against Grossman. It introduced against Thayne Taylor the statement that Taylor had given to the police. The jury was instructed that it could only use it against Taylor, not Grossman. While the courts have ruled that it was a constitutional error against Grossman to admit Taylor’s statement in this way, they have ruled that the error was “harmless” given the other testimony pointing to Grossman’s dominant role in the crime.

In 1990, Charles Brewer signed an affidavit retracting his trial testimony against Grossman. He said that he assisted the authorities because he believed they would help him with his own case. He said that the authorities had told him to continue talking to Grossman and had fed him questions to ask. Among other things, Brewer had testified that Grossman had told him that he had shot Margaret Park because he did not want to be arrested by a woman. In his affidavit, he said that the prosecutors emphasized to him “the female officer thing” when they were preparing him to testify. During the trial, the prosecution had repeatedly emphasized the suggestion that gender had been part of the motive for the killing. In his affidavit, Charles Brewer said that “I cannot say Martin told me that” and “Martin never said he shot her”. On 14 January 2010, the Florida Supreme Court overturned the death sentence of another inmate, Paul Johnson, after finding that the state had induced him “to make incriminating statements to a jailhouse informant”, and because the prosecutor had known the statements were “impermissibly elicited” and yet had introduced them at the 1988 trial. On 21 January 2010, a Florida judge rejected the argument that Grossman should receive the same relief as Johnson, on the grounds that there was no evidence that the state knew Brewer’s testimony was false at the time of Grossman’s trial. This and other issues are currently on appeal to the Florida Supreme Court.

Amnesty International opposes the death penalty unconditionally. To end the death penalty is to abandon a destructive, diversionary and divisive public policy that is not consistent with widely held values. It not only runs the risk of irrevocable error, it is also costly, to the public purse as well as in social and psychological terms. It has not been proven to have a special deterrent effect. It tends to be applied in a discriminatory way, on grounds of race and economic and social status. It denies the possibility of reconciliation and rehabilitation. It promotes simplistic responses to complex human problems, rather than pursuing explanations that could inform positive strategies. It prolongs the suffering of murder victims’ families, and extends that suffering to the loved ones of the condemned prisoner. It diverts resources that could be better used to work against violent crime and assist those affected by it. The USA has carried out 1,193 executions since resuming judicial killing in 1977. Florida accounts for 68 of these executions. There have been five executions in the USA this year.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: Please send appeals to arrive as quickly as possible:
- Explaining that you are not seeking to excuse the killing of Margaret Park;
- Noting Martin Grossman’s young age at the time of the crime, and that he has spent 24 years on death row;
- Expressing concern that the jury heard no expert mental health testimony, noting the post-conviction assessment;
- Calling for clemency for Martin Grossman and for commutation of his death sentence.

APPEALS TO:

Governor Charlie Crist
Office of the Governor
The Capitol
400 S. Monroe St. Tallahassee
FL 32399-0001
Fax: 1 850 487 0801
Email: Charlie.Crist@MyFlorida.com
Salutation: Dear Governor Crist

PLEASE SEND APPEALS IMMEDIATELY.
Check with the AIUSA Urgent Action office if sending appeals after 16 February 2010.

———————————-
Tip of the Month:
Write as soon as you can. Try to write as close as possible to the date a case is issued.

** POSTAGE RATES **
Within the United States:
$0.28 – Postcards
$0.44 – Letters and Cards (up to 1 oz.)
To Canada:
$0.75 – Postcards
$0.75 – Airmail Letters and Cards (up to 1 oz.)
To Mexico:
$0.79 – Postcards
$0.79 – Airmail Letters and Cards (up to 1 oz.)
To all other destination countries:
$0.98 – Postcards
$0.98 – Airmail Letters and Cards (up to 1 oz.)

Amnesty International is a worldwide grassroots movement that promotes and defends human rights.

This Urgent Action may be reposted if kept intact, including contact information and stop action date (if applicable). Thank you for your help with this appeal.

Urgent Action Network
Amnesty International USA
600 Pennsylvania Ave SE 5th fl
Washington DC 20003
Email: uan@aiusa.org
http://www.amnestyusa.org/urgent/
Phone: 202.544.0200
Fax: 202.675.8566

———————————-
END OF URGENT ACTION APPEAL
———————————-

No responses yet

Jan 26 2010

Eine Bitte

Ich bin auf der Suche nach deutschsprachiger Literatur zur Todesstrafe in den USA. Nach meinen eigenen Recherchen ist diesbezüglich nur wenig vorhanden. Mit “deutschsprachiger Literatur” meine ich ausdrücklich keine aus dem Amerikanischen Sprachraum übersetzte Werke (wie z.B. Sr. Helen Prejean’s “Dead Man Walking”) sondern Literatur deutschsprachiger AutorInnen.

Sollten Sie Literaturtipps für mich haben würde ich mich über einen Kommentar oder eine E-Mail sehr freuen.

Herzlichen Dank.

No responses yet

Jan 25 2010

Überblick 25. Januar

Published by Joachim Kübler under Blogosphere

Jeff Gamso hat vergangene Woche sich in 3 Artikeln mit dem “Phänomen” Death Row Celebrity beschäftigt und allenthalben für Diskussionen gesorgt. Der Begriff “Phänomen” ist nicht wirklich gerechtfertigt da es sich noch nicht mal um eine Handvoll Death Row Inmates handelt denen man den “Celebrity-Status” anhängen könnte, und mit Sicherheit würden diese den Status für sich selbst nicht beanspruchen. Einer der Handvoll ist Mumia Abu-Jamal, an dem sich Jeff’s Kritik und die Reaktionen darauf – z.T. aus der Solidaritätsbewegung für Mumia Abu-Jamal – entzündete. Die Kritik an Jeff’s Kritik ist nicht unberechtigt, andererseits bin ich der Auffassung dass der Kern von Jeff’s Argumenten absolut richtig ist. Aber am Besten denken Sie selbst darüber nach.

Nochmals Jeff Gamso - Sharon Keller, Vorsitzende Richterin des Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, hat den Freibrief um weiter pünktlich um 17 Uhr zu schließen (vor allem dann wenn Handwerker zu Hause ankommen sollen), auch wenn ein Last Minute Appeal vor einer Hinrichtung eingereicht werden soll (und es technische Probleme gibt).

Terry Lenamon geht auf die Probleme der Verteidigung von Angeklagten in Florida ein.

The Ironton Tribune beschäftigt sich mit den Problemen der Verteidigung von Angeklagten in Mordprozessen in Ohio.

Das DPIC verweist auf Wood v. Allen. In der Urteilsbegründung der Mehrheit – geschrieben von Richterin Sonia Sotomayor – wurde ein Urteil des 11th Circuit Court of Appeals bestätigt wonach es nicht ein Fehler des Strafverteidigers war dass er nicht die Jury darauf hinwies dass Wood an einer Borderline-Störung leidet. Wood wurde wegen der Ermordung seiner Ex-Freundin zum Tode verurteilt.

opinion 08-9156

Das Prison Law Blog weißt auf den Fall eines Gefangenen in New Jersey hin, der einer Scheinhinrichtung auf dem Elektrischen Stuhl unterzogen wurde…

Doug Berman weißt auf einen Kommentar in der Sacremento Bee hin, in welchem gefordert wird dass die Todesstrafe in Kalifornien auch wirklich eine Todes-Strafe ist.

Und hinsichtlich Kalifornien: Sagen Sie “Hallo!” und besuchen sie das neue Blog einer guten Freundin von mir, Jane Mackay, welche in Nordkalifornien lebt und arbeitet.

No responses yet

Jan 24 2010

Welcome!

Published by Joachim Kübler under Blogosphere

Welcome to the blogosphere the Prison Law Blog.

…For now the posts are mostly links (with some commentary), but in the future I am hoping to add more original content including updates on prison reform litigation and legislation around the country, and Q & A features with lawyers who work in this field.

Via Doug Berman.

No responses yet

Older Entries »